Bill Simmons on the Bulls' Failure to Make a Trade

The Bulls are sticking with the team that got them this far (tied for 4th in the weaker conference). ESPN.com's Bill Simmons writes that was stupid:

Quote:
When the media guide for the No Balls Association is released, I demand that John Paxson appears on the cover. At some point, you have to roll the dice, right? Not landing Gasol was inexcusable; the Bulls could have made the Finals with him (and if it meant sacrificing Luol Deng, Ty Thomas and the Knicks' pick, so be it). Instead, they did nothing ... which means they overpaid Ben Wallace when they already had a younger version of him for two-thirds the money (Tyson Chandler), gave away Chandler AND J.R. Smith for an expiring contract (P.J. Brown) because they wanted a trading piece for the deadline, then never ended up making a freaking trade.

I mean ...

Where does that rank among the most bizarre/inexplicable/head-scratching game plans in recent NBA history? Near the top, right? And if that's not bad enough, Paxson should have sold high on the Knicks' pick in December -- once the Celtics, Bucks, Hawks and Nets started getting crushed by injuries and the Iverson/Philly situation fell apart, everyone and their brother could see a 35-win season for the Knicks coming. What was the purpose of holding on to that pick? Are we even sure Paxson is alive? Has anyone seen him in the past three months? If he's missing or dead, I apologize for the last three paragraphs.

Simmons watches a lot more NBA than I do, but I can't believe that Gasol would have gotten them to the NBA Finals this year. And, if he didn't, trading Deng, Thomas, and a 1st round pick would have been a terrible long-term deal, especially with the big leap forward Deng has made this year.

An emailer to Simmons had the same thought. Simmons responded on his blog: "Sometimes in sports, you have to push your chips to the middle of the table. This seemed like one of those times."