Don't miss out on any games this baseball season! Buy Cubs bleacher tickets, Brewers Opening Day tickets and Padres baseball seats. Coast to Coast Tickets can be your source for cheap Chicago Bears tickets, the best price on Chicago Bulls tickets and countless other events!
JustGreatTickets.com has the most sought after Chicago Cubs tickets, the the best deals on all Chicago tickets, MLB Tickets including Red Sox Tickets and Yankees Tickets and more.
Find the perfect Cubs tickets for the perfect price here at OnlineSeats. We have an incredible selection for seats at Wrigley Field and every other MLB baseball stadium.
A home for Cubs news, commentary, blogs, video, and discussion, along with news and blog aggregation.
Alas, financial terms were not disclosed, [UPDATE: Thanks to AdamSt for pointing out the details in comments], but I think we can nonetheless assume that Mr. Rusch is today a very happy man.
Here are some fun stats:
1997 - 5.50
1998 - 5.88
2000 - 4.01
2001 - 4.63
2002 - 4.70
2003 - 6.42
2004 - 3.47
2005 - 4.52
Career - 4.88
Those are Rusch's ERAs for every full season he's been in the majors, along with his career ERA. Put simply, Rusch is about as average as they come. Naturally, then, it's important to lock him up for two years - gotta keep the wild-card dream alive.
Comments
Rusch
October 31, 2005 by cubsnet, 4 years 19 weeks ago
Comment id: 760
Not exactly the most creative move.
I like Rusch well enough, but were there any other teams knocking on his door ready to give him two years? Seems unlikely.
The Cubs' feeling that they needed to give him two years also says something about the failure of the Cubs' farm system to develop and keep healthy the large stockpile of talented pitchers they had in A-ball in 2002-03. If you're not producing your own players, you're going to sign mediocre veterans to multi-year multi-million dollar deals.
Of course, if Rusch can have two years of his 2004 season, this deal will turn out great. But the possibility of that is slim.
re: Rusch
October 31, 2005 by Brian C, 4 years 19 weeks ago
Comment id: 762
The Cubs' feeling that they needed to give him two years also says something about the failure of the Cubs' farm system to develop and keep healthy the large stockpile of talented pitchers they had in A-ball in 2002-03. If you're not producing your own players, you're going to sign mediocre veterans to multi-year multi-million dollar deals.
Maybe, but my impatience with Hendry runs a lot deeper than that. The fact of the matter is that they don't need to sign Rusch to a two-year deal whether the minor leagues are producing or not.
Here's the thing: Rusch was originally acquired by the Cubs when they signed him to a minor league deal in April of 2004. Basically, he had had a disastrous year with the Brewers the year before, and had washed out with the Rangers(!) during spring training. But Hendry saw something and brought him aboard.
And you know what? It was a good move, the kind of thing that validated Hendry's stellar reputation as a talent evaluator. It wasn't a one-shot deal, either; finding Ryan Dempster and Joe Borowski were similar validations, and Scott Williamson may yet work out pretty well, too.
The problem, then, comes with handing out multi-year deals to guys that you found for nothing, and could replace just as easily as you found them. I know the Cubs aren't the Royals or Athletics; they don't have to be as careful with these things as those teams do. But how can Hendry not learn a lesson from his successes? Why can he not see that a guy who came to the team on a minor league invite with a highly indistinguished track record is not in any way irreplaceable?
To make my point clear, even if they're not developing the players they should be, we have a guy as our GM who has a good record of finding guys just like Rusch, but without the committment and salary demands. So what does it say about Hendry that he values Rusch so highly anyway?
Simply, I think it says that he's a GM who either doesn't recognize his own strengths, or who ignores his strengths in order to take what he sees as the safest path.
Excellent analysis.
October 31, 2005 by cubsnet, 4 years 19 weeks ago
Comment id: 763
Excellent analysis.
Rusch contract
October 31, 2005 by AdamSt, 4 years 19 weeks ago
Comment id: 761
ESPN reports $6M for two years -- http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/story....
$2.75 in 06, $3.25 in 07 with $500,000 in performance bonuses.
Not the best contract signing, but not the worst. Kind of average, like Rusch.